Happy Veterans Day

Yeah, I know it's tomorrow, but 1), I don't write on weekends, and 2), it's a holiday for goodness' sake.

I've been working on a Veterans' Day post for hours. I had one about how I felt regarding Veteran's Affairs call for veterans to wear their medals on civilian clothing this year.

I worked up something about it being Polish Independence Day, and was trying to tie it into the Polish Air Force getting their first batch of F-16s.

I had another one about being alone at twilight at the Antietam battlefield, and letting myself get choked up reading the names and regiments from the monuments. And one about my trip to Arlington National Cemetery when, already staggered over the scale of the place, I kept doing the arithmetic on the gravemarkers- I couldn't stop myself glancing on all sides and calculating the ages of the fallen and every one like another punch in the head reminding me that, at 25, I had already outlived them by a damn sight and I let the tears come.

But none of those posts really got me where I wanted to be, and now I'm tired and frustrated with my inability to express what I want to express.

So I'll just say this:

Thank you to every veteran of every service branch. Each of you gave up something to do your duty and I cannot thank you enough for your commitment and sacrifice, and especially those who were asked to risk what I was not.

Posted by GeekLethal GeekLethal on   |   § 4

Early predictions of election fallout

From a WSJ dispatch delivered to my inbox 5 scant minutes ago:

Big Pharma Catches a Chill

Fears that Democrats will tackle drug pricing caused shares of pharmaceutical companies to slide, even as analysts cautioned that Democratic control of the House is unlikely to bring much immediate change for the industry.

My initial thought was "Good". My next thought, really just an amplified version of the first, was "Fuck 'em". But defining "'em" isn't necessarily as easily done as you might think.

A wise reader could intuit that I don't own any pharmaceutical stocks. That wise reader would be wrong, as it turns out. I own shares in Pfizer. But my view of Pfizer or any other pharmaceutical stock is separate from my view of the the economic relationship between the citizens of the US and their drug pushers. There are good companies with bad stocks, and vice versa. I presently like Pfizer's stock, but may not continue to do so. I don't like the industry, however.

If, by some freak of useful government action in the 110th Congress, our legislative overlords were to attempt to remedy the fact that US citizens pay exorbitant prices for drugs, I'd be hugely in favor. Do I think the drug companies make too much money? Nope, not overall. Do I think they make too much money from US citizens? Yep.

Part of that is the fault of some combination of drug company marketing and a peculiarly American desire to do with drugs what others do without. But a meaningful part of the mismatch is an indirect subsidy levied on Americans to pay for rock-bottom prices granted to other countries' citizens. No, it's not done out of the goodness of the drug companies' hearts - they negotiate prices with virtually all of their customers. All, it seems, except those in the US. The fact that they don't generally have to negotiate much at all inside our borders frees them to enter into aggressively negotiated deals elsewhere without shedding too many tears.

If it takes an act of Congress to get the rest of the world to pay the market rate, then so be it. If this results in other countries' citizens paying more for their drugs, then tough shit (though I'm sure there's a drug for that!). And if that market rate, or market resistance to it, has some initial detrimental effect on the drug companies, so also be it. A large component of the differential between US health care spending (as a portion of GDP) and that of the rest of the world is comprised of us paying for their drugs.

I hope the "analysts" referred to in the Wall Street Journal article are wrong. Godspeed, Pharma-bashers. 

Posted by Patton Patton on   |   § 2

Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos

Massachusetts Governor-elect Deval Patrick crushed former Lt Governor Kerry Healey by at least a 2-1 margin statewide. Patrick is the first non-white to hold the post; Healey would've been the first woman. You'd a thunk that in absurdly PC Massachusetts, such a decision would've been tough to make, with voters just spinning in circles trying to decide which candidate was mroe deserving. But no- even the towns Healey ended up taking were closely contested. Not surprisingly Democratic candidates across the Commonwealth dominated their rivals, when in fact there were rivals- several races were unopposed.

The Boston Globe has a spiffy breakout of who did what where here.

Somehow, Deval's message of hope, reconciliation, rainbows and puppies resonated with a large majority of voters, voters who seem to think that paying higher taxes for the same services is a big step forward. His economic plan of taking more money away from people who produce through taxation in order to attract(!) business to the state frankly baffles me, but I'm sure an economist could explain to me.

Actually, better yet, I'd rather a business owner explain it to me.

But you know, I'm really not bitter about it- it's not like my guy lost. Mitt Romney washed his hands of the place awhile ago to pursue national attention, and he's been something of a ghost in Healey's campaign- lots of sightings or suggestive distant noises, but little conclusive evidence of his existence. Besides, I think everyone- yes, everyone, at that level of politics is a snake, so there's that.

What I am is surprised that so many people ate Deval up, especially from among such cynical people as Yankees tend to be. Well, now with a Dem governor, Dem legislature, and ridiculous judiciary, the Commonwealth may well finally be the utopian society that everyone's longed for for so long.

The thousands who fled the state over the last couple years were probably just mean-spirited hatemongers.

Posted by GeekLethal GeekLethal on   |   § 11

Attack of the Killer Land Contracts

Everything seemed to be going so smoothly. That should have been my clue that everything was about to go balls up. Either that, or I should have known better than to post about something that hadn't happened yet, and was thus subject to the jinx. I am now informed that the land contract issue might be a killer, and that we might not be able to get that property. Land contracts are standard when the acreage involved is more than about ten acres. Land contracts as a rule require 20% down payments. We don't have 20% of $350k. Fuck fuck fuckity fuck fuck.

But, I tell myself, all is not lost. First, we are approved for a mortgage - all we need to do is find a place that is less than ten acres. We can use my wife's idea for the addition to increase the value of the house we buy, sell it in a year, and have enough cash once we sell to put a down payment on a 20 acre plot like the one we want to get now. The plan is not necessarily derailed, and we won't even necessarily lose time. We would, though, have to go through the hassle of buying, selling and moving again.

Also, I have moved into a quick reaction mode in regard to the 20 acre plot - I've talked to the boss of my current lender to see if something might be done. He informs me that it is remotely possible that, by offering more documentation of my resources and history, and writing several begging letters, the underwriter might offer a waiver on some of the restrictions that normally apply. So we'll do that. I've called three other lenders to see if they perhaps might offer something more congenial, and hopefully by later today they will have some positive news.

Having made the decision that we want that particular land, it's a true pisser that we might not get it. And all this additional hassle is to say the least unwelcome. We'll see what happens.

Posted by Buckethead Buckethead on   |   § 1

What is this "land contract" you speak of?

This last Saturday, the Buckethead clan once again traveled up to the Shenandoah Valley to examine the property I discussed in my last post. This time, through careful advance planning, we got to see the interior of the house, and got a much better idea of the lay of the land. The short answer is that the lot suits our needs, and we will be making an offer on it directly. The plan, therefore, is about to kick into gear.

There are some issues, though, as might be expected. The house is on the small side, and has very low ceilings. There are power lines running through the field on the other side of the road, which will limit the number of places that we can site the new house that we plan on building. There are some concerns about septic and water. And the length of the commute will, frankly, fucking suck.

None of those problems are insuperable, though. Since we are planning already on making a (very large) addition to the house, the size is not an issue. The height of the ceilings is harder to get around, but if there are other parts of the house that are more vertically spacious, it might just seem charming. The power lines are a potential problem, but since the part of the lot that is on the other side of the road is still pretty big, we feel that we’ll be able to work around that one. The commute, though - I’m just going to have to take the hit on that one. All of that, along with some information from the county zoning officer (a very nice lady) to the effect that getting a three or four bedroom PERC (percolation test, which determines how many bedrooms you can build) should not be difficult and that we can divide up the property the way we wanted (either through a rezoning, or just by means of clever surveying) means that the house and land side of the deal is all in place.

Which means that something else must be screwed up. And, lo, it is. We are running into some financing issues. This is very frustrating, seeing as I was under the understanding that we were already approved. When the loan guy said bad news, my paranoid mind immediately began obsessing about credit ratings the phrase “you’ll never get a loan, you loser” began echoing in my skull. As a distant murmur, I heard him saying something or other about “land contracts” and “house value.” I almost interrupted him with, “Good Christ, man! What does this blather have to do with my insufficient credit?” But then I slowly realized that he was saying that I had been approved, he’d cut us a check – if we were buying a house.

Which it seems we aren’t. We are now told that when you’re buying a lot of land along with your house, it isn’t the same as a normal house contract. It is instead a land contract, and the mortgage company that had already approved us doesn’t handle those. There are two factors which go into deciding which category a property falls into – one, the proportion of the values of house and land, and the total acreage. We’re about fifty-fifty on the value question, which may allow us to proceed – maybe. However, 20 acres is probably over the line into land contract. We may have to start the financing process all over again with a lender that does do land contracts. We can get it expedited, in which case it won’t affect our timetable, but we may no longer have access to all the nifty options you can get with a normal house loan. Which may or may not suck.

At the very least, though, we were assured that getting a loan isn’t a problem, which is a relief. So, we will likely make an offer in the next day or so, and the plan will be off and running.

Posted by Buckethead Buckethead on   |   § 1

Girl Power, Like It Used To Be

The Slits were one of the more interesting stories to come out of the great first wave of London punk bands in the late 1970s. Indeed, they are only incidentally 'punk,' in that the teenaged founding members (all female) began their careers as musical incompetents of the "bashed guitar and screamed vocals" school. But by the time Cut, their debut album came out in 1979, the group had moved far beyond the strictures of formal 'punk,' integrating reggae rhythms and dub production into their arsenal. Their second (and last worthwhile) album, 1981's Return of the Giant Slits deepened their commitment to experimentation, adding world-music gestures to their already wide-ranging sound. After these two achievements, the band broke up as its members began to work in other ensembles. They joined bands like X Ray Spex and The Raincoats as legendary pioneers of independent-minded feminist punk, but for the next two and a half decades didn't record another note together.

The closest comparison I can make to the Slits' classic albums is to Public Image Ltd's Metal Box LP, which merged reggae, rock, punk, scratchy and sketchy guitar work, and (let's say) "interesting" vocal performances) in a similar manner. If you're not familiar with that record, then all I can say is that the Slits' music was difficult, catchy, bassy, super-feminist, creative, and off-putting in equal measure, and they deserve the reputation they have as one of the most pioneering and essential British punk bands. It's not necessarily anything that every person on the planet needs to have in their collection, but people who are into PiL, Neil Young's noisy and angry side, Lou Reed, or post-punk of the Mission of Burma/Sonic Youth school, really need to get their Slits on.

And now The Slits have re-formed and seem intent on recapturing the old magic. Last year, core members Tessa Pollit (sometimes Pollitte) and Ari Up (sometimes Upp) teamed with Sex Pistols drummer Paul Cook, Adam and the Ants guitarist Marco Pirroni, and the daughters of Cook and The Clash's Mick Jones to record three songs for a newly released EP, Revenge of the Killer Slits.

I'm not quite sure what to make of it. Revenge is either a nostalgia trip or a bold new offering, or it could be both. I can't tell. The lead track, "Slits Tradition" is a clattering and edgy mess that merges their old blocky punk-reggae sound with 2006 hip-hop beats to decent musical effect. However, the lyrics aren't anything special, featuring Ari Up boasting about the Slits' greatness in a faintly embarrassing dancehall accent. It's a little good, a little not-good, faintly embarrasing, but deeply intriguing.

The second track is more straightforward; an old-school punk workout called "Number One Enemy" that was written in 1976 and belongs completely to that era. From the Sex Pistols-y guitar to the one-note vocals, this is 100% nostalgia trip, albeit a pretty good one.

It's the third of three that's worth the price of admission. "Kill Them With Love" is a dubby and spare drum-and-bass track which puts Up's vocals (which influenced Siouxsie Sioux and Bjork, to name just two) right up front. Although it's not exactly the greatest thing I've ever heard, it does promise good things from a more permanent Slits reunion. It indicates that Up and Pollit still have some of the old magic and possibly some new mojo too, and are not just adults who still think they can relate to kids these days. If nothing else, the fact that they are trying as adults to revist what they did so very well as teenagers suggests they haven't lost the boldness that made them great.

There's a lot left unsaid by this three-song EP. The original Slits were stunning partly because they were so consciously political, so consciously feminist, and so musically fearless. The risks they took and the rules they broke paid off in spades in 1979, and whether that's because they were too young to know better to too young to care is beside the point. But the Slits are now in their forties, and it's too early to tell whether that crazy-ass energy that made their original work so thrilling and creative has left them, or merely matured into something new and thrilling.

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 1

Wikipedia: the trash midden of the future

Interesting perspective on the usefulness of Wikipedia - not so much as an encyclopedia, but rather a resource for those amongst our progeny who decide to study us. Kind of a backhand slap to the Wikipedians, too: "history won't care if you're right or wrong, but your quaint biases and loquacious misinterpretations and wrongheadedness will be so wonderfully useful to the grad students of the future." Might oughta be right.

Posted by Buckethead Buckethead on   |   § 3

Casa de Novo de Buckethead

At some point in the next few weeks, Casa de Buckethead will undergo a change in venue. The current CdB is a modest but comfortable split-level suburban home south of Alexandria, with a nice big yard and a friendly neighborhood. It has been a pleasant place to live these last three years. While my parents have been extraordinarily kind to let us live there (the house was once the home of my stepgrandfather) they need the money that the house represents to more fully retire. Mrs. Buckethead and I considered purchasing the house ourselves – not least because it would mean dodging a move – but as we pondered what it is, exactly, that we want – we realized that in most respects suburban life is deeply unsatisfying to us.

Suburban life is at best an awkward compromise. You have most of the crowding of living in a city, yet none of the convenience of being able to walk to restaurants, shops and, dare I say, cultural activities. A big yard may be nice, but if you’re going to have to drive everywhere anyway, why not live in the country and have a really, really big yard? City life is fast-paced, exciting, and even mildly dangerous. I’ve done that, and liked it, even if it was a relatively small Midwestern city. Yet now, I have a wife, two kids, a dog and between one and three cats. I am arguably in my mid thirties, but just barely. I have little desire to live in the city myself, and none whatsoever to subject my children to that.

One of the biggest objections to the country is the commute if you still work in the city. But for the last year, I have found myself in the ridiculous position of commuting over an hour completely across the Washington Metro area twice a day. Since my commute is that long, why not use that hour to get out into the country? Further, I’ve been able to work at home more and more, which would ease the commuting burden.

So, the country. Having made the decision to get out of the city, and not to buy another suburban house, we were still left with many questions to answer. How far out? What kind of house? And then Mrs. Buckethead asked one more question. A Zen kind of question, the sort that when answered rearranges your whole outlook. She asked, “You know that dream house you’ve talked about – is there anyway we can build it?”

My dream house has been for almost two decades now a colonial style fieldstone house. (My first dream house was a very large castle with secret passages. Earlier, it was an orbital space fortress with secret passages. Then it was a Dr. No-style evil lair, with secret passages. I haven’t given up on the secret passages.) We typed “Build your own stone house” into the magical google search field, and lo, we found this.

It is, apparently, a relatively simple if labor intensive process to build your own fieldstone house. Especially if you eschew the traditional method of stone masonry and adopt a hybrid method called “Slipform Stone Masonry.” Essentially, you have wooden forms, and you line the inside of the forms with fieldstone. In the middle, you place rebar and then pour in concrete. The concrete holds the stones together, and the rebar holds the concrete together. What you end up with is a reinforced concrete wall that looks like a traditional stone house. (There are many variations that take into account insulation, passive solar, interior construction, etc.)

The advantages of this method are many. First, the resultant wall is immensely strong. Second, it requires very little skill to create one. Third, and most important, it is stupendously cheap compared to most other methods of construction more advanced than a mud hut. In the country, in rural farming areas, there are typically large piles of fieldstone that farmers have removed from their fields. They are, we are told, eager to get rid of them. Concrete is inexpensive, as is rebar in the quantities we’re talking about. So, the main component of the house, the load-bearing walls, is essentially free.

After a few moments to convince myself that these hippies weren’t on the pipe when they wrote that, I became very excited. I almost smiled, even. For the rest of the weekend, and most of the next week, the Missus and I could talk or think about little else. We scoured the web for more information, and tried to assemble it into a coherent plan. We calmed down a little, and let the ideas percolate in the background. A couple weeks later, we hauled them back out, and they still looked good. We gave new orders to our real estate agent, and began looking for properties that fit the plan. Last weekend, we found what we think is a suitable property, and tomorrow we will return to examine it further. We know that it has gorgeous views of the Shenandoah Valley. It is twenty acres, which means more than adequate acreage to split the property. And best of all, it includes a very large pile of fieldstone. If the interior of the house is acceptable, and a tour of the lot passes the test, we’ll make an offer.

So here’s the plan. Mrs. Buckethead came up with the initial idea of building our own house. I came up with an idea that might make this not only affordable, but even profitable.

Step 1: buy a large plot of land in the country, one that has a decent house on it, and – this is key – is sub-dividable.

Step 2: build a new house on the other side of the property from the existing house.

Step 3: move into the new house, and sell the pre-existing house.

Now, we have fine-tuned the details a bit. Originally, we thought we would build a garage using all the techniques that we’d be using in the house. This would serve the dual purpose of training us in the methods without any significant risk, on a smaller project; and assuring that we could work happily together on a project like this. Both of us like working like this – I turned to IT at least in part because manual labor pays fuck-all. But the Missus came up with a better idea – practice by building an addition to the existing structure, which would also increase the value of that house when we go to sell it.

For the next several months – until Spring – we will be researching and planning. Researching all the legal restrictions, permits, codes, and whatnot. (And there are a shitload of them. Enough to make you want to become a wild-eyed Libertarian Anarchist or something. What is this country coming to?) Researching the building methods, suppliers, and design. Designing the addition and the house, and converting those designs into working drawings, bills of materials, and making timetables and schedules. And as soon as it gets warm, we’ll start building.

We hope in two years to have built our house, and sold the original. With the addition, we hope that the sale will at least cover the amount of the mortgage, leaving us with our dream house (with secret passages) free and clear. The beauty of this plan is that selling the existing house makes the land on which we build our new house effectively free. And if we sell it for enough, it might even cover construction costs. But at a minimum, it will sell for enough to cover a huge chunk of the mortgage.

Over the course of that time, I also plan to blog about the project, in what will for some be nauseating detail. I’ll be posting the details of the planning, and later the construction. But in the meantime, here are some views of the Blue Ridge from the front of what I hope will be my new house:

image image image

Those views, and the next one, all are looking out over the valley. This next one also includes the garage, which is a bit deeper than the average garage, and will make a wonderful construction workshop. The land we'd actually build on is to the right of the garage, out of the picture and across the street, but would have the same views of the mountains. (Well, mountains for east of the Mississippi, anyway.)

image

[wik] Addendum, writing in the year of Our Lord 2025:

So with an excess of mulish stubbornness and delusions of adequacy, this is still the plan. For the last almost exactly nineteen years, I have been working toward the fulfillment of this plan. It's kind of bittersweet reading this optimistic effusion from my two decades younger self. My son is now an adult, and now not even my only son. So much time has passed to little account - at least regarding what has remained my goal no matter what insanity has raged outside the shutters.

Not to sound maudlin, because in most regards life has been very good. But damn, the dark forces have been persistent in their alignment against the plan.

So, we never got that property. We got another property that cost a bit more and was a bit less suitable for the plan. But it seemed like we could make it work. Then, our mortgage was sold to a company that turned out to be a tad unethical. Criminal in point of fact. That, and dislocations following from my improvident choice to be working as a consultant at Freddie Mac as the 2008 financial crisis hit, led to a two year waking nightmare as the mortgage company repeatedly put the house up for sale as leverage in a quite successful attempt to suck as much money as possible out of my wallet.

We ended up just walking away from the house in 2010. Though I was fully aware of the hit I'd take to my credit score, I have never felt more relief than I did driving down the dirt road away from the house the last time. 

So then there was a decade spent wandering in the rental wilderness. Occasional layoffs, constant relocations thanks to fickle landlords, seeming to always have half my belongings in boxes - this was our lot. But the more important things - Mrs. Buckethead and the Buckethead gens were always there, healthy and for the most part happy.

In 2019, we began to see light at the end of the tunnel. Sure, housing prices were creeping up, but I was advancing in salary and the bad credit had finally begun to rotate off the ass-end of my credit report. The savings account was, if not fat, certainly a bit svelte. Time to once again pull the trigger on the plan. I was looking at properties on zillow, and generally feeling a pleasant anticipatory buzz. The Buckethead clan home improvement steering committee believed that sometime in the Spring of the new year, we could get our property.

Then the Kung Flu Grippe dropped on the world like a very large heavy thing hitting a very soft and squishy thing. The company that signed my paychecks had foolishly build a successful enterprise managing logistics for large medical conferences. I was building a web registration system for them. And suddenly, large medical conferences disappeared in a puff of poorly thought out epidemiological policy making. And with that, so also my paychecks. 

Mad scrambling ensued, but despite the economic dislocations we were little affected by the upheavals. We homeschooled, we didn't hang out with people. Before too long, I found employment again. But housing prices had spiked insanely and my credit took a minor hit with the new job and needed some recovery time. Our landlords decided that this was the perfect time to sell the house we were living in and cash in on the price spike. Looking at the new mid-covid rental landscape, we were frankly horrified. So we bought a camper and took a trip around the country thanks to my new full-time remote job and the miracle of Starlink internet. Saved up more money...

Finally, in 2024... we were once more property owners. 100 acres of forested hills in wild, wonderful, West Virginia of all placesVirginia, our former home state, was simply out of our price range for any significant acreage. We've spent the last year clearing out the accumulated detritus of the former owners, and settled in, and got some chickens and turkeys. Life feels good. 

At long last, I can consider once more pulling the trigger on the plan.

Posted by Buckethead Buckethead on   |   § 30

Drama at the Breeders Cup?

Could be, based on an article in today's Philadelphia Daily News, entitled "STUDLY DO-WRONGS" (subtitled "Some horses are standing dud").

The question du jour seems to revolve around the mating proclivities of the winner of the 2002 Kentucky Derby and Preakness Stakes.

Now, since I sincerely, deeply, aggressively, and completely don't care about others' sexual proclivities, not even if the "other" in question is a supposedly well-known evangelist I've never heard of, it was initially looking difficult for me to give this story more than a passing glance.

The author enlightens about the mating habits of certain equine special interest groups, like so:

Curiously, War Emblem has been less than a star in the breeding shed. In fact, he has been a colossal dud. Shipped off to stand stud at Shadai Stallion Station in Japan, he has impregnated only a handful of the hundreds of mares who have been led to him. The problem has less to do with fertility than with libido, which is to say War Emblem has been decidedly disinterested in the fair sex. Given that homosexuality is not uncommon in the animal kingdom, some have wondered if War Emblem had an eye for the boys. That very question was asked by Outsports.com: "Is War Emblem Gay?"

Well, I don't know about you, but in the highly unlikely event I have some future question about the world of gay sports, outsports.com would now be my "go to" source. As an added plus, it's clear that they're not limited to serving the needs of the two-legged, as they clearly cover matters related to quadripeds, too. So I've learned something. In addition, I've learned that even in horses, it's apparently common to deem one sex "fairer" than the other. Noted.

Any good article has a hook, of course, and I found mine in this bit:

The bottom line is that horses are not unlike human beings when it comes to sexual behavior, which is to say that it is varied, capricious and given to an array of unforeseen obstacles. In light of the big money involved, it can be an utterly exasperating undertaking, especially if you happen to discover that instead of the second coming of Northern Dancer, the horse you have standing at stud shows up one day wearing an ascot and humming show tunes.

After seeing that line, I read the rest of the article, and even though it reached its zenith at the show tunes jab, I found it an interesting use of those couple of minutes of my life that I'll never see again. Irreverance, it seems, remains the preferred hook to get and keep my attention.

[wik] Speaking of both irreverence and gay evangelicals I've never heard of, this bit from Ace of Spades, entitled "Biggest Story Of The Century: Some Guy You Never Heard Of Is A Homo"

Posted by Patton Patton on   |   § 1