Hello Mr. 100-foot Wave
Scientists have recently (this millennia) come to the conclusion that large rogue waves do, in fact exist.
Over the centuries, many accounts have told of monster waves that battered and sank ships. In 1933 in the North Pacific, the Navy oiler Ramapo encountered a huge wave. The crew, calm enough to triangulate from the ship’s superstructure, estimated its height at 112 feet.
In 1966, the Italian cruise ship Michelangelo was steaming toward New York when a giant wave tore a hole in its superstructure, smashed heavy glass 80 feet above the waterline, and killed a crewman and two passengers. In 1978, the München, a German barge carrier, sank in the Atlantic. Surviving bits of twisted wreckage suggested that it surrendered to a wave of great force.
Despite such accounts, many oceanographers were skeptical. The human imagination tended to embellish, they said.
Moreover, bobbing ships were terrible reference points for trying to determine the size of onrushing objects with any kind of accuracy. Their mathematical models predicted that giant waves were statistical improbabilities that should arise once every 10,000 years or so.
That began to change on New Year’s Day in 1995, when a rock-steady oil platform in the North Sea produced what was considered the first hard evidence of a rogue wave. The platform bore a laser designed to measure wave height. During a furious storm, it registered an 84-foot giant.
Then, in February 2000, a British oceanographic research vessel fighting its way through a gale west of Scotland measured titans of up to 95 feet, “the largest waves ever recorded by scientific instruments,” seven researchers wrote in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.
It's an interesting article in its own right, but I was struck by the similarity to the scientific establishment's resistance to the idea that rocks might fall from the skies. The words meteorology and meteorite describe the study of weather and extraplanetary debris falling to earth. The reason the names are so similar is that scientists refused to believe, for decades and despite the evidence, that the rocks that fell were anything but atmospheric phenomena.
How will we get to the singularity with such stubborn researchers? And indeed, one might ask, "Why do they hate the rogue waves' freedom? Sailors have been reporting these waves for centuries. But oceanographers told them, "Silly seamen, our models say that a wave like you describe could only happen once in ten thousand years. And you already reported one. So you must be lying. Your ship must have sank due to pilot error." The power of what you know you know is for most people inescapable. Like an overactive spam filter, we reject those parts of reality that fail to match our model of reality. Truly, acceptance of ignorance is the beginning of wisdom. Hey, maybe we don't know everything about oceans. What if - just sayin, now, what if there really were big honking waves? Five years later, you've got the beginnings of a warning system and a deeper understanding.
§ 5 Comments
[ You're too late, comments are closed ]


When I was driving for ArmCo
When I was driving for ArmCo I worked Sundays with a former Navy sailor. We talked alot about martial life, dumb shit we'd both done, etc.
One thing though that a sailor has a chance at experiencing that a soldier, under most conditions, does not is stark terror in the face of monstrous waves at sea.
In one case, he told me about a horrible winter storm in the North Atlantic that had his destroyer bobbing up, down, and everywhere like a cork. It was night, we was doing his duties as much as possible under the sea conditions, when the bow pitched sharply downward into what looked like, for a brief second, a hole in the sea. A hole that, by all appearances, seemed about to swallow the whole damn thing.
It didn't, of course; the "hole" swiftly filled with rushing waves that battered the ship further, but it just corked up onto the next crest. Not a rogue wave, but scary wave action nonetheless.
We agreed that "scientists" had no clue about such things, and that it was probably the work of a Kraaken baby screwing around in the tub.
In The Perfect Storm -- a
In The Perfect Storm -- a fantastic book if you haven't read it already -- the author wrote as if rogue waves were an accepted fact. In fact, he mentioned that the maximum theoretical height of a wind-driven wave has been calculated at 198 feet.
I remember also running across a post to that effect at WoodenBoat magazine's forum, and one of the old hands' reply: "I really wish you hadn't told me that."
I would not want to say hello
I would not want to say hello to Mr. 198-foot wave.
I'm not sure an aircraft
I'm not sure an aircraft carrier would survive that.
I'm not sure what the writers
I'm not sure what the writers/contributers to this non-story are smoking, but I'm an Oceanography major and the Physical Oceanography types at ODU have been pretty unanimous in their addamance that rogue waves are neither mysterious nor questionable.
The old height limit for wind driven sea waves was debunked after the observations from Rampano in the 30's (that was not a rouge wave BTW) and rogue waves have been well documented for years.
The only question was what caused them but this seems to have been figured out fairly early. My first oceanography textbook ( bought used in '91) had a description of rogue waves, and Dr. Johnson, the head of the Oceanography dept. has for years seemed rather amused at reports of "mysterious" rogue waves.
The only discovery here is satelite observation providing the proof that they happen more often than previously observed, but that was pretty much the theory anyway as I understand it.
OTOH "Mysterious new threat!!!!!!" likely gets more grants for scientists, or perhaps these gyus were just really behind the curve. :)