A new low

Once, in a brighter age, I was a movie afficianado. I saw everything. I loved good movies, and I loved bad movies. The badder, the better in many cases. (Evil Dead, They Live for example.) Today they announced the Oscar nominees. I have seen 1 (one) movie nominated for major awards. That's it. Okay, two if you count the Best Animated Film category as a major award. Ten years ago, I would have seen all but maybe one of the movies up for the big ones, and most of the movies up for the technical awards. This year, it's the exact inverse.

The one movie I've seen is "Walk the Line," the Johnny Cash biopic. And, of course, the Wallace and Grommit Curse of the Wererabbit flick. And "March of the Penguins," nominated for best documentary. Aside from those, I saw "Batman Begins," "War of the Worlds," "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire," "Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith," which were nominated for assorted technical awards.

The real reason for this cinematic apathy is not a a decling interest on my part in movies. Or even the widely rumored decline in the quality of films produced. The reason I don't see movies is about three feet tall and named John Christian. Three year olds don't behave well in movie theaters. And the prospect of paying out the yin yang for a sitter just to watch a movie I may or may not like is simply inconceivable.

The only time Mrs. Buckethead and I actually go see real movies in actual movie theaters is at the big holidays, when we have family (read: free babysitters) to watch our spawn. The very limited opportunities for movie watching has had a drastic effect on how we choose which movies to watch. Generally speaking, we only watch movies that we can be sure ahead of time that we will really enjoy. And among that small group, we are likely to pick the movie that woould be the most impressive on the big screen - in order to maximise our movie experience. In other words, we'll watch Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire twice before going to see something like "Syriana" or "Good Night, and Good Luck." Not to pick on Mr. Clooney, but if he wants to see us watching his movies, he really ought to star in a big budget special effects extravaganza with lots of explosions.

As John has gotten older, his impact on our movie watching has only increased. For the first couple years of his life, we could watch more or less anything on video. He was simply unaware of what was happening on screen. This eased the process of accomodation - we were able to wean ourselves off the movie crack gradually. But after watching "Christmas Vacation" and having John ask, "Where's the Kitty?" we realized that even that option had been closed off. And since John is a night owl like Mrs. Buckethead and myself, the only way I'll ever watch my Sin City DVD is if I get up at five in the morning and watch it before I go to work. Which isn't really an option at all.

Seeing as we have another spawn cooking right now (she'll be done sometime around the end of March) it will be at least another five years before I can watch movies again. If we have another kid, that day will be pushed back to sometime after 2012. Hopefully by that time they'll be able to beam movies directly into my nob.

Posted by Buckethead Buckethead on   |   § 7

§ 7 Comments

1

Netflix, a laptop, and a train commute, my man. It's the only way.

FWIW, Netflix has *changed my life*.

2

Are you kidding? Even kid friendly movies can have...interesting moments. We decided to let our 5-year-old daughter watch Bambi, but we wanted to make sure we were in the room when Bambi's mother got shot. We didn't think it'd be too bad, because she had fish and some of them had died. So the scene came, and went. Nothing. When Bambi's dad came, we asked "Who's that?"

"That's his dad. His mom's gone."

Unable to restrain myself, I asked where she was.

She gave us the most annoyed look, because we were interrupting her movie, and then in tones that screamed "Duh mom, pay attention", she said "She's DEAD. They SHOT her." And went back to watching her movie.

3

Johno, I just signed up for Netflix. Sometime this afternoon should arrive the Aristocrats, which I dearly wish to see. No violence or explosions or dead kitties, so I should be able to watch this one. John won't be paying attention to people merely talking. I've been bled white by late fees for years, and I'm kicking myself for not having signed up sooner. Hell, most months my late fees would have paid for the Netflix.

TiVo, Netflix. I now have near total control over my media consumption. If only pay-per-view or on demand services through cable weren't so damn expensive. A Netflix style service - flat rate, watch anytime - served over the cable would be truly fantastic. Even if they got movies the same time as they come out on DVD, rather than later. No irritating wait for movies to arrive via snail mail.

Tracy, my boy is not quite to that level. He was seriously wondering where the kitty went.

4

The Aristocrats... that's an experience. It's amazing how quickly one becomes deadened to even the most disgusting things. About the fifth time that someone sticks their wang in the family dog you're all like "yeah, yeah... what else you got?" Which for me was the most interesting part of the film experience. It really separated the wheat from the chaff, to see which comedians could make me laugh/recoil anew... kudos to Bob Saget, Sarah Silverman, and that one guy at the end who tells the joke to his toddler. Among others.

My own version of the Aristocrats involves a Saddam Hussein mask and gardening tools.

5

I thought that I would never, ever have reason to laugh at a mime.

I was wrong. The expressions on the faces of the passers by were just amazing.

The several inverse versions of the joke were hilarious.

6

Absolutely! As was Robin Williams' re-telling of the joke I first knew as "booga-booga" as "the aristocrats"

Sarah Silverman is a genius.

7

I've heard Bob Saget on Howard before. He's really a funny, funny guy. He seems to have purposefully cultivated that douche-y persona for the video show, but that's not really him.

The real Saget thinks testicular injuries are uproariously funny.

[ You're too late, comments are closed ]