Freedom good... terror bad...

A Harvard study finds that the root cause of terrorism is not poverty, but oppression.

A John F. Kennedy School of Government researcher has cast doubt on the widely held belief that terrorism stems from poverty, finding instead that terrorist violence is related to a nation's level of political freedom.

Associate Professor of Public Policy Alberto Abadie examined data on terrorism and variables such as wealth, political freedom, geography, and ethnic fractionalization for nations that have been targets of terrorist attacks.

Before analyzing the data, Abadie believed it was a reasonable assumption that terrorism has its roots in poverty, especially since studies have linked civil war to economic factors. However, once the data was corrected for the influence of other factors studied, Abadie said he found no significant relationship between a nation's wealth and the level of terrorism it experiences.

"In the past, we heard people refer to the strong link between terrorism and poverty, but in fact when you look at the data, it's not there. This is true not only for events of international terrorism, as previous studies have shown, but perhaps more surprisingly also for the overall level of terrorism, both of domestic and of foreign origin," Abadie said.

Instead, Abadie detected a peculiar relationship between the levels of political freedom a nation affords and the severity of terrorism. Though terrorism declined among nations with high levels of political freedom, it was the intermediate nations that seemed most vulnerable.

Maybe our chimpanzee in chief wasn't blowing smoke up our collective ass when he insisted that the spread of freedom will make us safer.

Posted by Buckethead Buckethead on   |   § 4

§ 4 Comments

3

Since Bush has ratcheted back on political freedoms in this country, can we therefore expect a corresponding rise in terrorism?

Can't say I don't get amused when those on the right pick and choose nuggets from the academic droppings of the "liberal elite". ;)

4

Oh, I forgot that Bush has instituted a police state. But, if you read the article closely, you will notice that repressive states also are safe from terrorism, as the fear of the all powerful FBI, I mean, secret police keeps the potential terrorists in check. Its the awkward, in-between cases that are most at risk.

Ross, do you mean to imply that you do not "pick and choose"? You accept all the nuggets from the poo of the liberal elite? Discrimination has more than one meaning, and one of them is a good thing.

[ You're too late, comments are closed ]