Crusader? Victim?
By way of Dodgeblogium and Momma Bear at On The Third Hand, we find this essay by the Gray Monk. The Monk is talking about the history underlying our current difficulties in the Middle East, and makes several valid points.
Islam, the religion of peace, was spread by the sword. Beginning in the seventh century, in a matter of little more than a hundred years, Arabs fired with religious fervor conquered first Arabia, then Persia, Syria and Palestine, Egypt and North Africa and Spain. Except for Persia, these regions had been Christian for centuries. Over the next several centuries, Islam reduced the once mighty Byzantine Empire to a nub of Asia Minor and Greece. It moved East, eventually all the way to Malaysia and Indonesia.
For all but the last three hundred years, Islam has been pressing at the borders of Christendom. As late as the seventeenth century, the Turks besieged Vienna several times within a few decades. The great victory at Lepanto ended the threat of Islamic navies only in 1571. For most of a millennium, Islam was an ever present threat to the survival of the West.
The Crusades are a big problem for Osama bin Laden. He forgets that Islam won those wars, and Christianity failed to achieve even the very limited goals the crusaders set for themselves. The Crusades were meant to regain Christian control over the holy lands. No one ever imagined that the Crusades would eliminate Islam, or take back the formerly Christian lands then held by Islam. The tragedy of Andalusia was used as an excuse for the Madrid bombings. The Islamofascists forget that the reconquista was in fact a re-conquest of territory seized by Islam from Christians hundreds of years before.
The crusades were not some sort of proto-colonialism from Edward Said's fevered brain. Hundreds of thousands of Christians died in defensive wars against the Arabs and the Turks. Since the Renaissance, the Industrial and Scientific Revolutions, and the Great Age of Discovery, Europe transformed itself from a marginal, impoverished and backward region at the outskirts of civilization to the center of the world. (Some in America might argue that they're heading back to marginal, impoverished and backward.) Islam has not lost any power or wealth. But they have stood still while Europe, and later America and the Far East made enormous gains in knowledge, wealth and power.
Islam failed to keep up. And the people who say that America and the West need to look at root causes for solutions to the problem of terrorism are missing the point. By saying that, they usually mean that the West should amend its behavior, be nicer to the Arabs, or some other Pollyanna program. They oppose the one real solution that would get to the actual root cause - globalization and the spread of liberty, he network of ideas and habits that allowed the West and other civilizations to advance. And this is the program that we are trying to implement in Iraq.
§ 5 Comments
[ You're too late, comments are closed ]


Thanks for the trackback, but
Thanks for the trackback, but the name of the blog is On The Third Hand; MB is sure that Rev. Sensing of One Hand Clapping wouldn't be thrilled to be tossed in with the two Bellicose Women at OTTH.
My apologies, I was reading
My apologies, I was reading the estimable Rev. Sensing earlier. All two of my neurons must have been crossed. Correction made.
Thanks for the link - make
Thanks for the link - make some extremely valid points yourself in your article.
B, thanks for the links and
B, thanks for the links and analysis. Good stuff that I'd been thinking to myself for a while.
But haven't we been around and around the last bit before, about "understanding" the root causes of terrorism, and whether it's worth the time? Like [url=http://old.perfidy.org/comments.php?id=P1392_0_1_0_C]here[/url], [url=http://old.perfidy.org/comments.php?id=P1366_0_1_0_C]here[/url], [url=http://old.perfidy.org/comments.php?id=P1393_0_1_0_C]here[/url], and also [url=http://old.perfidy.org/comments.php?id=P1413_0_1_0_C]here[/url]?
Is it not possible that some of us wish to "understand" the terrorists so we can kill them better and be on guard for their kind coming back? I don't want to make nice, and I don't want to share candy with them. I want to understand them so we can crush them.
(Yes, at the very back of the line, after all the smacky-face is done with, there's some desire in me to learn lessons about bedfellows and allies of convenience. Since we aren't actually [em]in[/em] the army right now, it's sometimes fun to talk about these things now. But [em]understand[/em] me well... that comes second.)
Well, as long as they keep
Well, as long as they keep blowing shit up, we have to keep thinking about it. The leftist moonbats talk about root causes, and are wrong - not that there aren't any, but they are looking in the wrong place. It seems obvious to me that the first place you'd look to figure out why someone turns into a splodeydope is in their own culture, rather than ours. I think that our mission in Iraq is the one hope we have of actually addressing root causes - the systematic failure of Arab societies to provide anything at all for their citizens.