A Billion Ruby Ridges

Yesterday I left work early so the grunting men could move my office, came home, and got savagely depressed on half a glass of cheap wine and a private screening of The Big Lebowski.

A man's home is his castle, and yesterday the Supreme Court named them all Ruby Ridge. The Truth Laid Bear (linked) has aggregated a number of reactions to the Kelo case. Here's mine: The very notion that anyone's home - anyone's - is now up for grabs as long as a state or muncipal government thinks there might possibly be some potential gain in tax earnings to be had by tearing that home down, makes me want to puke. This session of the Supreme Court has really beefed a couple in a row here; between Raich and Kelo, I figure my best bet is to buy my own island and build a house there. That, or come up with a few billion dollars and move to a kleptocracy.

Eugene Volokh has argued (presumably rightly, he's a smart dude) that Kelo merely articulates or sums up recent trends in property law and therefore isn't anything new. True. But as Glenn Reynolds has observed, sometimes it takes an incident like this to open people's eyes to how deranged a situation has become. Take the aforementioned Ruby Ridge - before that awful standoff and Waco not long after, Americans who weren't already survivalist types had no idea that the US government could operate that way. Now every American above a certain age remembers what happened and knows somewhere deep inside in that place where you get nervous at traffic stops not to trust the guys in bad suits and aviator shades.

How can Kelo end well for anyone? The Republicans need to work pretty hard to distance themselves from this opinEyion, in which three out of five Justices in the majority were appointed by Republican presidents. Anyone that Bush nominates for the Court will (hopefully) have to distance themselves from the body's recent statist excesses. In the short term, it's possible that the housing market might come in for a shock as people realize that the deed to their house no longer counts for much. In the long term, I think we will probably see a few emboldened and outraged neighborhoods in standoffs with authorities. Either way, not good to say the least. Our liberty is a shockingly fragile thing when you stop to think about it, and days like yesterday make it seem like we're close to the edge.

Come for my house, and they'll have to call the 5 o'clock news and the National Guard. That's a g-d d-mn promise. All the dude ever wanted was his rug back, and all most people ever want is to be left the hell alone. In their house.

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 7

§ 7 Comments

3

I ran down some scenarios yesterday after this decision came 'round. Scenarios where the town decides to take my house.

Details were innumerable, but there were really only 2 versions at the core.

Both concluded with me dead and the town winning.

4

I ran through the same mental calculus, and came to the same two conclusions. Well, there was a third where I was in prison.

But does that disturb the point? We're both fine upstanding citizens. You're a veteran. I've got a midwesterner's sense of probity and law and order (Hank Hill without the board in his ass). And we're both contemplating whether it would be worth it to us to take a headshot defending our quarter acre with split-level ranch.

Of course it's an immediate thing in your case; I'm still a lowly renter.

5

Actually, I considered the prison ending but decided I'd rather die than be some thug's personal stress reliever. So, didn't count it as a distinct outcome.

I thought it about less from the angle of owning, and more from being a dad-to-be. The forthcoming Mini-G will have to understand principled stands. Unfortunately, the lesson would have to come from his mother, as I'd be dead.

And by the way:

Hank Hill without the board in his ass

It's an or-thotic.

6

Texas, which failed to get some of its business done during the regular session of the legislature, has seen the lawmakers recalled for a special session on property taxes and school funding.

But, to the credit of at least one">http://www.chron.com/CDA/umstory.mpl/metropolitan/3239023]one legislator, it looks like there's a constitutional amendment brewing in the near future here, as an add-on to the special session's agenda. All noises seem to indicate that there'll be plenty of support for such an amendment.

Which is a good thing, because I think there are more guns per capita here in Texas than in most other places. It didn't help the misdirected assholes in Waco, but a homeowner's revolt in Texas could get ugly, and there's no guarantee that the government would win.

[ You're too late, comments are closed ]