Penis enlargement will change your life
Over the past several days, I have received some atypical emails in my spambox. Typical in that it was unsolicited, unwanted and bothersome. But unusual in that it was actually... interesting. For years, it has been the unending drudgery of clearing out my email of exhortations to enlarge my penis (unnecessary), refinance my mortgage (irrelevant), buy dubious pharmaceuticals (unwise) or act as an agent for rich but not exactly liquid Nigerian widows. (Did you know that there is now a peins enlargement patch? Remarkable these new technologies.) We are seemingly entering a new era of spam. Take a look, if you dare.
Item One: The first of several unsolicited bulk emails from Congressional representatives came from obscure midwestern democrats urging me to support or not support various measures I found myself completely apathetic towards. So apathetic that I can not now remember the name of the congresscritters or the issues they espoused. For them, there is only this open letter from James at OTB:
Rather than simply acquiring the e-mail addresses of all bloggers that you perceive to be on your side of the political spectrum and sending them your every thought, however undeveloped it might be, you should consider carefully targeting your messages to those who your staff knows through careful research are actually interested in the topic you are communicating, as evidenced by having written about it recently.
Further, if you are a House Member that few people outside your District have heard of–which is to say, about 420 of you–you should be especially diligent about this. If, hypothetically, you often give radio updates in Dallas on pressing issues facing our nation, it is highly unlikely that any blogger not from Texas gives a rat’s would be interested in having transcripts of same mailed to them.
Item Two: I am informed by reliable sources that God does not eat meat. How reliable? Well, the guy that wrote a book called, “God Does Not Eat Meat” told me. In an unsolicited bulk email, no less. So it must be true. This title was odd enough that it ducked into my head, and proceeded to crouch in a corner of my mind hissing and spitting at me. I couldn't help but ponder the philosophical issues underlying such a bold claim.
I made a point of not actually reading the email, but just letting the thoughts roll over and through me. “Well, sure, God doesn't eat meat,” I thought. Of course, he – being an ineffable and omnipotent being – doesn't eat anything at all. So one could hardly make a case for vegetarianism by example to a being that doesn't eat meat only because it eats nothing at all.
Then I thought, “Hey, there is a long tradition of offering meat sacrifices to God. And not just mangy, fornicating pagan Gods, but our own uh, really big God.” So clearly, in historical times God dug the meat, so to speak. And remember, one of the very first stories in the bible was that of Cain getting his sacrifice of wheat and granola rejected (for no clear reason) by God. This of course led to the first murder, and shortly thereafter, the first appearance by Cain on antediluvian COPS. Scripturally, we can make a strong argument against eating vegetables. God, like my three year old son, doesn't like them.
But still the thoughts kept coming. Where is this dude's head at? Making fundamentalist arguments for left-loony lifestyle choices? Is this Rod Dreher's crunchy-con movement gone mad? Or is it a more particular kind of madness. Where the voices in Arthur Poletti's head just sounded like God. And told him not to eat meat, after they said kill your neighbors and bury them under the 711.
I may have to buy the book.
Item Three: All State Investigations sent me an email. Curious, I thought. What do they investigate? Well, in a word, Infidelity. With fifty years of experience in the field, they know infidelity. And they were sending a message to me. Did they know something I didn't? I did a little research, and discovered that All State Investigations Group, LLP located at 501 Stillwells Corner Road A-2 · Freehold, NJ 07728, is also registered as All State Investigations, Inc. Strange, they say they can find out anything, but they can't figure out whether they're incorporated or a partnership.
Over at their website, I did find some useful information. For instance, the top ten signs that your spouse or significant other is being less than perfectly faithful:
- Working a lot of overtime
- Excessive use of the interweb
- Unaccountable hours
- Hiding the phone bill
- Saying, “It's your imagination”
- Getting hang-up phone calls
- No longer interested in sex
- Not wearing a wedding ring
- New sexual techniques
- Saying, “I need my space”
Of course, the number one sign that your spouse is cheating on you is seeing your wife wearing a tshirt that says, "Adulterer."
I breathed a sigh of relief. My wife only displays eight of those symptoms, so things must be okay. But as I continued to peruse their website, I became more and more fascinated. ASI has for sale an infidelity test. It looks for semen in your wife's underwear. They offer computer forensics, GPS tracking, and debugging services. They have support for people in pain – chat rooms, online therapy, and links to local support groups.
And most interestingly, for only $36,500, you can start your own franchise. Become a private investigator! Live a life of danger, intrigue and stultifying boredom as you wait in the rain outside some slut's window waiting for a chance to videotape her indiscretions. Sign me up! I wanna be the new Philip Marlowe, and this sounds like just the ticket.
Item Four: Finally, I received what at first glance looked like another promotion for junk bonds. An INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY! But this one mentioned oil shale. That peaked my interest, since a while back I read a fascinating book on abiogenic oil, The Deep Hot Biosphere by Thomas Gold. I read with some interest, skimming through the INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES. The author of this Oil Report brought to my attention that there is a vast deposit of oil shale right here in these United States. And it is truly enormous. Trillions of barrels of oil, more than pretty much the proven reserves of the rest of the world. Wow, thought I, that's a shitload of oil. I thought to myself, “Hey, why haven't I heard of this?” But Matt Badiali, Editor of The Oil Report, has an answer. You just haven't heard about it yet.
Matt kindly mentioned some people who have been talking about it. Like the World Energy Council, which had this to say:
It is estimated that nearly 62% of the world�s potentially recoverable oil shale resources are concentrated in the USA. The largest of the deposits is found in the 42 700 km2 Eocene Green River formation in north-western Colorado, north-eastern Utah and south-western Wyoming. The richest and most easily recoverable deposits are located in the Piceance Creek Basin in western Colorado and the Uinta Basin in eastern Utah. The shale oil can be extracted by surface and in-situ methods of retorting: depending upon the methods of mining and processing used, as much as one-third or more of this resource might be recoverable. There are also the Devonian-Mississippian black shales in the eastern United States.
And like the RAND Corporation. RAND is the big leagues when it comes to science and government. And a little googling revealed that they do indeed have a report out about the Green River Oil Shale And right there in the second paragraph of the report, we find that Matt Badiali is essentially right:
The largest known oil shale deposits in the world are in the Green River Formation, which covers portions of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. Estimates of the oil resource in place within the Green River Formation range from 1.5 to 1.8 trillion barrels. Not all resources in place are recoverable. For potentially recoverable oil shale resources, we roughly derive an upper bound of 1.1 trillion barrels of oil and a lower bound of about 500 billion barrels. For policy planning purposes, it is enough to know that any amount in this range is very high. For example, the midpoint in our estimate range, 800 billion barrels, is more than triple the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia. Present U.S. demand for petroleum products is about 20 million barrels per day. If oil shale could be used to meet a quarter of that demand, 800 billion barrels of recoverable resources would last for more than 400 years.
Then I thought to myself, “Hey, oil shale is hard to process. It's not like pumping oil out of a hole in the ground like towel heads do in Arabia.” Matt was there for me. With oil so damn expensive, more expensive recovery techniques are profitable. And the oil shale in the Green River formation is especially, uh, oily. Compared to the oil sands in Alberta (which are much smaller) the rock at Green River is twice as oil rich. And almost all of this stuff is under government property. And now the government is letting people in.
Matt is tracking some companies that are well poised to profit from all this. Some people have some new techniques for cheaply processing oil shale for crude. Investing in them would no doubt be wise. Greed aside, though, it is a happy thought that when the Arabs, Iranians, Venezuelans and whatever whackjob ends up in charge of Nigeria all decide to screw us at the behest of Red Imperial China, well, we've got more oil than you can shake a stick at, plus the stick. And, we've got the bomb. So back the fuck up.
§ 4 Comments
[ You're too late, comments are closed ]


A private eye calls 'em "dame
A private eye calls 'em "dame's", not sluts.
There's your first lesson. You can pay me the $2,135 next blogmeet.
"Then I thought to myself,
"Then I thought to myself, Hey, oil shale is hard to process. It’s not like pumping oil out of a hole in the ground like towel heads do in Arabia. Matt was there for me."
Wrong! Badiali is there for him. And all the rest of the sharks out there peddling their wares to the greed crazed.
This information Badiali is peddling as "The U.S. Government's Secret Colorado Oil Discovery" is nothing new. The "discovery" in the Green River Formation was made over a hundred years ago.
YOur intuition was right. Shale is extreemly hard to process by conventional mine and retort process. And there are some new technologies. For example, attempting to extract oil from the shale while its still in the ground by heating an entire field to 700 degrees and holding that temp for 3 years while the oil cooks out into liquid form. And thats after the entire perimeter is frozen and kept frozen to isolate it from ground water. Many of the deposit areas are covered with overburden of 500 to 1000' and themselves are 500 to 2000 feet deep. So this is a massive undertaking and leases for these proto-projects have just now been let. There's a long way to go.
I'm not going to go into more details here but there is good, solid information from the industry, the BLM under the DOE, and indepentent researchers that one can research in the due dilligence process. I'll be happy to share some links if anyone is interested.
The industry as well as the BLM are both being very conservative about any hype around short term success. The hype is coming from guys like Badiali who cherry-pick excerpts and use then to promote their agendas which is to put your money into their pockets or promote their point of view. Worse, they embelish, commit pervasive errors of ommission, and, in some cases, just flat out lie.
For example, you probably got turned on by this...
"There are over 16,000 square miles of oil shale in the Green River formation...
Each acre holds 2 million barrels of oil -- it's the most concentrated energy source on earth, according to the Energy Department."
As you learned from your research (and good for you for doing that much), he's right about the last half of the last sentence. The Green River Formation contains an estimated 1 to 2 trillion barrels. Thats as much or more than all the known reserve of light sweet crude. But he didn't tell you how far out even the industry says they are from extracting it on a commercially viable basis. There will be some trickling production going forward in the near term but we are years from commercial production levels.
Now lets look at the rest of the statement. Did you think to do the math? There's 640 acres in a square mile. X 16,000 = 10,240,000 acres. At 2 million barrels per thats over 20 TRILLION barrels. That would be alot of molassis were it true, 20 times the known global reserve and 10 to 20 times any credible estimated potentials. But nobody in the industry is making anywhere near that claim and Badiali knows it. What Badiali is peddling with flat out lies is more malarky than molassis.
I know, I know, he didn't say 20 times. He said 1 to 2 just like everybody else. But the reader reads 16,000 square miles of the stuff and every acre contains 2 million barrels and they start to froth at the mouth and then they have an orgasm... exactly the reaction Badaili is looking to create.
Sad part about is he could tell the truth and be just as successful in the final annalysis if not more so. But he's not interested in the truth, he's interested in transferring your money from your pocket to his pocket.
To suggest to your readers that "Investing in (new techniques) would no doubt be wise" is just plain irresponsible without also advising extreem due dilligence of these emerging new technologies.
And that goes 100 times for Mr. Badiali. Why? Because he already knows better.
I was insufficiently clear,
I was insufficiently clear, there at the end. I didn't mean to suggest that people should invest with someone who uses spam as a marketing tool, for starters. I was attempting to be snarky as a lead up to my closing comment - but I guess not snarky enough.
I'm sure, with some research, you or I or anyone could find some petrotech firm that is worthy of investment, and some of them might be involved in oil recovery from shale. But with research. And not with Matt Badiali.
This post does not constitute qualified investment advice. Nor any other post on this blog, by any of the authors. We ain't starvin', but we ain't rich neither.
But on to the technical bits.
But on to the technical bits. I, for one, would love more links to more information. Perhaps it would be more blogfodder. Probably. I know that recovering oil from shale is difficult - the in ground process is ridiculous, really; and while the above ground process is easier you have the problem of getting the shale above ground. Tough either way.
But there is a point at which oil prices become high enough to trigger a real effort to get oil from shale. Once that happens, human ingenuity will likely find ways to do it better. The trouble in all this to predict when, how, and by whom.