In USA, television watches YOU
Oceania has always been at war with... ahh shit. Who'm I kidding? Here I am with a story about a new video display in development by Apple that contains image-collecting cells interlaced with the image-emitting ones, thereby permitting a fully functional two-way video screen, and all I can come up with are Yakov Smirnoff and George fricking Orwell.
Is there an office I need to report to, to have my pundit-pass torn up? Or at the very least stamped "HACK" in giant red block capitals?
[wik] Speaking of George Orwell, I just read a fascinating brace of books. First was Orwell's debut novel, Burmese Days, drawn from his experience in His Majesty's colonial service, and about the deranging effects that colonialism has on colonizer and colonized alike. Apparently Orwell had some problems with the system.
Shortly after reading that, my loving wife the librarian handed me Finding George Orwell in Burma, by Emma Larkin, an American author raised in Southeast Asia. A few years ago, Larkin returned to Myanmar in order to visit all the places that George Orwell either wrote about or himself visited while in the Service, with the notion of making a book out of the trip. Along the way she uncovered the terrible and disheartening fact that Orwell is viewed by those few intellectuals who manage to endure under Myanmar's insane regime as a veritable prophet of their misery. In the back rooms of shops, in apartments with the shutters closed, in groups of two and three so as to not require an official "gathering" permit, people meet to read, exchange, and discuss books, handing moldering paperbacks by Western authors from hand to hand, racing against time and mildew to absorb the text before the books fall to pieces or they are discovered, detained, and disappeared by the government's vast network of informants. In this sub-sub-sub culture, this demimonde of intellectual resistance, they treat 1984 as though it were the roadmap to the system that rules their world.
Being that Myanmar's military rulers do in fact intrude in thousands of ways into every moment of every person's life, spoon feed the populace "news" that advances their purposes, mandates constant public displays of love for the rulers and hatred of the enemy (both internal enemies of the state and the puppeteers that ostensibly move them from abroad) and acts vigorously and without scruple to crush out every spark of independent thought, it turns out that in Myanmar, 1984 isn't merely a chilling if slightly hokey novel for seventh-graders. It's goddamn holy truth.
§ 3 Comments
[ You're too late, comments are closed ]


J,
J,
Well one key difference is that there is no escape from the state or its agencies in 1984. Recall that even the last hope of resistance, the "proles", was itself carefully maintained by the state.
You would get alot of mileage out of his non-fiction; a multi-volume set exists, the first of which is Age Like This, 1920-1940.
I only read volume 1 but was really enjoying it. Dig his snippy book reviews, or his short story about a used bookstore, or the prisoner being led to execution, or about being wounded by a sniper in Spain, or...
Just check it out.
True enough, but that's cold
True enough, but that's cold comfort to someone sitting in a hut in Myanmar with a head full of illicit knowledge and not a single weapon of any kind, physical, rhetorical, or political, with which to fight.
Cold as a needle taken from
Cold as a needle taken from your freezer and jabbed straight into your eye.
One thought I have is that if they're thirsty for Orwell and Orwell accessories, then maybe it's not a stretch to imagine they're reading how to fight totalitarianism. Sure there was no fighting Big Brother in any meaningful or permanent way, but I understand that they know the difference between fiction and fact. Or at least, between what's fiction and what's plausible.
Maybe it's plausible for them to create the mechanisms that will improve their society. Maybe the larger obstacle is not the availability or dearth of weapons- physical, rhetorical, political- but how much people are willing to put at risk in order to wield them.
Because, unless they can shit some strategic relevance, we're certainly not going to trouble ourselves freeing them from their bondage.