All The Sophistication Of A Ham Sandwich
There's nothing a loyal Republican enjoys more than "reading" something like Ted Rall's essay on motivations in Iraq at a Grade 2 level, and sliding obliviously past the deeper meanings encoded in those oh-so-tricksy wordies.
"Writes like he means it". Bullshit. Go read Rall's article and find a way to read it as anything other than insight into what the enemy's possible strategy is. Makes sense to me. Now the question is, what do we do about it?
"Some people want the terrorists to win." What a crock of shit. You might find the odd nutjob out there, but by and large, the loyal opposition in this country wants an adjustment of strategy, not goal.
Posted by
Ross
on
| § 2
on
| § 2
§ 2 Comments
[ You're too late, comments are closed ]
Instapundit is so g-d d-mn
Instapundit is so g-d d-mn lazy, not to mention uncommonly arrogant. The "related" Armed Liberal comments that he links to in the discussion of Ted Rall only "relate" in that the AL discussion is about a political cartoonist.
Jeez... one would think he doesn't read everything he links to, or thinks about it, before posting.
Ross, some people DO want the terrorists to win. It's just that most of them don't live in this country. Nevertheless, if they exist somewhere, you must consider Glenn's statement as accurate. I see that you are obviously mistaking the genius of Instapundit for ignorant pot-stirring. Silly Ross!
And now the same people who
And now the same people who endorsed Kim "Bitch, Fix Me A Plate!" duToit's screed against gays, women, and sweater-vests last week are getting screedly themselves, convinced that every word Ted Rall speaks is a truly-meant turd of hate directed at his country.
Jesus. Sometimes I think bloggers in general are smart folks, then sometimes again I really, really don't.