When it absolutely, positively has to be on the front overnight

A platoon of the 506th PIR is pinned down on a mountainside, surrounded by an unexpectedly large - and growing - number of jihadis. They parachuted in the night before, to set up an observation post to monitor traffic in this remote region. The American troops have a good defensive position. They could hold it forever against the ill-trained and under-equipped mujj. But no position is secure when you run out of ammo. And that time is not far away.

The nearest airbase is five hundred klicks to the south. Two transports have been shot down in past month, and brass is concerned about losses. They're not about to lose millions of dollars of expensive transport. But the sergeant seems serenely unconcerned about remf penny-pinching cowardice. The reason becomes clear when a low hum begins to sound from behind the ridge above them.

Seconds later, a flock of jeep sized helicopters popup over the ridge – each clearing the ridge by inches, and each in exactly the same place. The drone cargo helicopters (operated by some spec-4 in Bahrain, the sergeant imagines) circle the paratroopers’ small defensive enclave. As each passes over the small beacon the troops placed in the small clearing, the jeep helicopter snap-flares to a complete stop, and drops a cargo pallet out before moving on. In ten seconds, a ton of ammunition, mortars, and (thank you, God! cigarettes) has been robotically, automatically delivered.

Over at Murdoc’s post on the V-22 Osprey, James left a comment that really caught my imagination.

Stepping back though - advances in tech are rendering alot of its functions redundant. For example GPS guided air drops could replace many of its cargo functions.

Personally, I think a hummer based ducted fan UAV that can carry about 300- 500 lbs of cargo would be more effective. (Basically it would enable the creation of a GPS unmanned mobile resupply function) Think of just in time resupply chain.

Of course, appealing to the “advances in technology” idea is sure to catch my imagination. I can’t believe I never thought of this, but it is so obvious in retrospect.

The advances that are driving the rapid development of reconnaissance uavs (and soon, ucavs) could just as easily drive the development of cargo uavs. Once we’ve got the trick of using flocks of uavs dependably, there’s no reason not to scale up the size of the vehicles. There’s no inherent reason that drones need to be small. (And the Global hawk isn’t tiny, even now.) The same intelligence that will keep a recon uav on station for days at a time, and maneuver it to the targets it needs to provide imagery for would guide a cargo plane or helicopter from a depot to wherever troops need supplies.

An automated airdrop mechanism wouldn’t be too hard to develop – just something that would open a door and kick out a pallet on command. GPS and local beacons would make it all work. And because there’s no pilot, there’s no risk to flying in low and slow for deliveries.

James’ idea of humvee sized ducted fan uavs is right out of Bladerunner, and it would be cool as hell to have those. It would be cool as hell to have manned versions as gunships, too. But people have been trying to get the ducted fan thing to work for decades, with not even as much success as the V-22. But the same software that would work for fixed wing uavs would also work for rotor uavs.

The HURT system I posted on earlier, matched up with a inventory/supply management system, could easily form the basis of a nearly automated tactical combat supply distribution system. Palletized supplies would be automatically loaded on unmanned cargo planes and helicopters, and these would be automatically organized into flocks for delivery to troops in need. The management of the individual uavs would be independent of the management of the supplies, the system and its operators would handle the coordination.

Posted by Buckethead Buckethead on   |   § 7

§ 7 Comments

1

Buckethead

The airforce already has a lot of a systems needed to fullfill an automaticed supply system. The Sherpa system.
http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_SHERPA,,00.html

With respect to ducted fan vehicals. Actually, ducted fans have been used in many vehicals. Ironically, the forerunner of the V22 is the X22 which used ducted fans for lift. The VSTOL version of the F35 is a ducted fan.

A lot of the software and hardware is currently being deveioped under the DARPA's Organic Air Vehical program. BAE systems has a self funded program that could be scaled to fit light cargo needes.

http://www.na.baesystems.com/releasesDetail.cfm?a=35

2

Ducted fan UAVs...yes, Bladerunner makes sense; I can see that.

But my first reaction was the HKs from Terminator.

Build 1,000 of them, programmed to erase everything with a heat signature, and send them out over bad places. They'll check in when they're finishe

4

James, I meant to say small ducted fan vehicles, like the Moller 400 aircar. The ducted fan in the F35 has a whole jet engine to power it.

5

Buckethead - I guess will have to agree to disagree. IMO - the issue with small ducted fan vehicals has been an issue of lack of damand, not a technical inability. If there was a technical issue with small ducted vehicals - you would not see BEA System self fund UAV's using the tech.

From a technical perspective a ducted vehical has many advantages over rotor vehicals. More efficient, lower noise levels, smaller blade size requirements and so on. The primary reason ducted fan vehicals have never been prominant is 1) tradition and 2) a ducted vehical has speed limits due to aerodynamics of the fan shroud. 3) To date there has never been a proven demand for a small ducted fan passenger system. (the old Catch22 of supply and demand)

With respect to the Mollar aircar - IMO the issue is not the viability of the ducted fan system. (its a proven tech) the real issue is the viability of mass market flying vehical with low skill pilots. I would love to see the insurance actuarial tables on flight hours vs crash safty.

6

James, I guess my information is incorrect. I hadn't had the impression that smaller ducted fan vehicles were terribly viable.

If it is the case that small DFs are efficient, I wouldn't be surprised to see them on uavs - but so far, it looks like most are going the fixed wing or helicopter route.

And maybe Moller is just a wanker - last I heard he had built the thing, but all it could do was hover a little.

7

Buckethead - Moller is a wanker - under capitolized and gives ducted fans a bad name, by overpromising. If his car does 1/2 of what he claims within a year - I'll start a Moller for supreme dietyhood movement.

[ You're too late, comments are closed ]