Justice Scalia versus common sense

Score one for privacy!! Today, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that essentially overturned all state sodomy laws still on the books. The decision was 6-3, and Scalia, Rehnquist, and Thomas dissented. Scalia took the unusual step of reading his dissent from the bench: 

"The court has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda. . . .The court has taken sides in the culture war," Scalia said, adding that he has "nothing against homosexuals." 

Oh Really, sir? And I bet some of your best friends are homosexuals, too. 

Scalia is this close to being a great justice, and would be but for his willingness to let his own moral codes take precedence over legal questions. 

[moreover] Although I applaud strict constructionism of the Constitution in general, I feel it has limits. Much like few Christians follow every single word of the Bible, Constitutional fundamentalism is an irrational and unsound, though logically safe, philosophy. 
 

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 0

[ You're too late, comments are closed ]